by dipayandas · Visionary
Feedback
The analysis demonstrates a strong grasp of Jungian theory, particularly the distinction between introversion and extraversion and the nuances of thinking functions. It effectively connects Walter's internal vision and subsequent actions to Ni and Te, moving beyond stereotypes. While it addresses some alternative typings like INTP and ENTP, a more explicit engagement with potential Se-dom or Te-dom arguments, given his forceful external actions, would strengthen the counterevidence handling. Overall, the argument for INTJ is well-constructed and plausible, explaining his character arc naturally.
I completely disagree. Since when did "vision" became an alternative word for "goal"? Everyone has some goal, and many of them even work towards it. Does that make half the population Ni-dom? Or does it mean that only Ni-doms are successful. This argument is very generic which doesn't hold up well with actual Jungian theory.
Sign in to reply.